Challenges and Consequences of the Environmental Impacts of Turkey’s GAP Project in the Region and Its Assessment under International Law

Authors

Keywords:

environmental culture, microbiology, international law, GAP project

Abstract

The Southeastern Anatolia Project (GAP) of Turkey represents one of the world’s largest water development and dam-building schemes, with far-reaching environmental, social, and security implications for West Asia. While the project has been officially promoted as a means of economic development, agricultural expansion, and energy production, its transboundary impacts have generated serious challenges for downstream countries, particularly Iraq and Syria, and indirectly for Iran. Reduced water flows, wetland degradation, intensified desertification, and the expansion of dust storm sources have undermined food security, public health, and social stability across the region. This article adopts a descriptive–analytical approach to evaluate the GAP project in light of the core principles of international environmental law, including the obligation not to cause significant transboundary environmental harm, the duty of cooperation, and equitable and reasonable utilization of shared watercourses. The findings indicate that the unilateral implementation of GAP is inconsistent with these legal principles and raises the issue of Turkey’s international responsibility for environmental damage. The study concludes by emphasizing the need for regional cooperation, integrated water resources management, and the application of international legal norms to ensure sustainable development and long-term environmental security in the Tigris–Euphrates basin.

References

Akbari, N., & Mashhadi, A. (2019). Environmental Threats and Commitments of the Government of Turkey in Implementing the GAP Project with Respect to Adverse Environmental Impacts on Iran. International Law Journal(61).

Asari, M. (2015). The GAP Project: A Fire Under the Ashes of Excessive Dam-Building in Turkey’s Anatolia.

Asari, M. (2018). Legal Analysis of the GAP Project and Turkey’s Obligations Toward the Tigris and Euphrates [Master’s thesis, University of Tehran]. Tehran.

Fereshtehpour, M., Roghani, B., & Mianabadi, H. (2015). Geopolitical Challenge of Transboundary Groundwater Resources Governance: With Emphasis on Iran. Geopolitics Quarterly, 11(39), 170-204.

Ghasemi, N. (2021). Environmental Criminal Law: A Comparative Study in National and International Law (3rd edition ed.). Khorsandi Publications.

Gruen, G. E. (2000). Turkish Waters: Source of Regional Conflict or Catalyst for Peace? Water, Air, and Soil Pollution.

Habibi, M. H. (2021). Environmental Law (4th edition ed.). University of Tehran Press.

Javadi, A., Pourhashemi, S. A., & Shirazian, S. (2018). Capacities and Limitations of the Development and Codification of International Environmental Law (A Critical Approach). Environmental Science and Technology, 20(1), 131-139.

Kaviani Rad, M., Farzaneh, S. P. R., & Nosrati, H. R. (2019). Revisiting the Concept of Water Security from the Perspective of Political Geography and Geopolitics. Geopolitics Quarterly, 15(1).

Kazemi, A. (2022). Turkey’s GAP and DAP Projects from the Perspective of International Law and the Mission of the Media. International Media Research Journal, 7(1), 45-85.

Kazemzadeh Shafiei, A., & Ebrahimi, S. (2022). The Need for Regime-Building Based on Integrated Water Resources Management: A Case Study of the Korr–Aras Basin. Majles & Strategy Quarterly(11), 33-60.

Kelleher, O. (2021). Systemic Climate Change Litigation, Standing Rules and the Aarhus Convention: A Purposive Approach. Journal of Environmental Law, 34(1), 107-134.

Kirschner, A. J., & Tiroch, K. (2012). The Waters of the Euphrates and Tigris: An International Law Perspective. Max Planck Yearbook Of United Nations Law, 16, 329-394.

Mackielo, A. L. (2009). Core Rules of International Environmental Law. ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, 16.

MacQuarrie, P. (2004). Water Security in the Middle East: Growing Conflict over Development in the Euphrates–Tigris Basin [M.Phil. thesis, Trinity College Dublin]. Dublin.

Mehrabi, A., Ebrahimi, H., & Panahi Mehrabani, M. (2023). Explaining the Impact of Turkey’s Hydropolitical Approaches on the Dust Storm Crisis in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Strategic Environmental Studies, 7(1).

Mianabadi, H., & Amini, A. (2018). The Intertwinement of Water, Politics, and the Environment in the Tigris–Euphrates Basin. Geopolitics Quarterly, 15(2).

Mianabadi, H., & Qoreishi, S. Z. (2022). Explaining the Paradigms of Realism and Liberalism in Hydropolitical Relations. Geopolitics Quarterly, 18(1).

Mirabbasi, S. B., & Elhuei Nazari, H. (2021). An Introduction to the International Criminal Court (3rd edition ed.). Javidaneh; Jangal Publications.

Mohammadi, H. R., Mirzaei Pour, T., & Hossein Pour, P. (2012). Spatial Analysis of the Hydropolitical Space of the Tigris–Euphrates Basin. Quarterly Journal of the Iranian Geographical Association(35).

Mottaqi Dastnaei, A., Saleh Abadi, R., & Tak Rousta, M. (2020). Explaining the Hydropolitical Reflections of the Ilisu Dam Construction in Downstream Countries (Syria, Iraq, Iran). Regional Development Geography(35), 303-332.

Mousavi, F. (2005). International Environmental Law (1st edition ed.). Mizan Publications.

Nami, M. H. (2011). Political Geography of Iran’s Border Waters (Rivers) (1st edition ed.). Zeytoon Sabz (Armed Forces).

Pishgahi-Far, Z., & Alizadeh, O. (2011). Environmental Security and the Transformation of the Concept of Security in the 21st Century. Geographical Outlook, 6(14). (Human Studies Journal)

Pishgahi-Far, Z., & Habibi, A. (2021). Geopolitical Analysis of Turkey’s Water Policies (GAP Project) and Their Consequences. New Century Geographic Territories(1), 137-154.

Pourhashemi, S. A., & Mousavi, M. a.-S. (2011). International Responsibility of States in Environmental Law. Encyclopedia of Law and Politics, 7(15), 71-94.

Pournouri, M., & Habibi, M. (2006). International Law of the Sea. National Oceanography Center.

Qolian, H. (2017). Elegies for a Dream: Has the Cost–Benefit of Turkey’s Mega-Dam Project Been Considered Under International Environmental Law? Law Studies(28), 159-186.

Rezaei, A., & Jalalian, A. (2018). Turkey’s International Responsibility Arising from the Implementation of the GAP Project with Emphasis on International Environmental Law. Law Studies Quarterly, 3(28), 159-186.

Sadeghizadeh, S. (2021). Paradigm Shift in the Meanings and Implications of the Concept of Security. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 24(1), 7-30. https://sid.ir/paper/411666/en

Sahan, E., Mason, S., Gilli, A., & Zogg, A. (2000). Southeastern Anatolia Project in Turkey – GAP.

Salari, A. (2020). Transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment in International Law. Public Law Studies Quarterly, 5(4), 1332-1355.

Shahandeh, B., Mohammadi Khosravi, A., Ataheri, A., & Fahremidas Bavand, D. (2020). The Southeastern Anatolia Project in the Context of Turkey’s National Identity Crisis. Global Politics (Scientific Quarterly), 9(2).

Shamshiri, S., Jafari, R., Mehrabi, S., & Baba Mohammadi, M. (2012). Introducing Simulation and Prediction Models for Dust Storms First National Desert Conference, Tehran.

Shirazian, S., & Khatibi, A. (2015). Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses with an Emphasis on Sustainable Development. Sustainability and Environmental Development, 2(4), 27-84.

Soffer, A. (1999). Rivers of Fire: The Conflict over Water in the Middle East. Rowman & Littlefield.

Ward, J. V., & Stanford, J. A. (1995). Ecological Connectivity in Alluvial River Ecosystems and Its Disruption by Flow Regulation. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 11(1), 105-119. http://www.d.umn.edu/~thrabik/Ward%20Stanford%20RegulatedRivers%201995.pdf

Williams, P. (2012). Euphrates and Tigris Waters – Turkish-Syrian and Iraqi Relations. In D. K. Vajpeyi (Ed.), Water Resource Conflicts and International Security: A Global Perspective. Lexington Books.

Zarei-Pour, M., & Askari, E. (2023). Environmental Literacy Education to Promote Environmental Protection Behaviors. Journal of Jiroft University of Medical Sciences, 10(1).

Zargar, A., & Abbasi Alouti, F. (2023). Security–Environmental Effects of the GAP Project on Downstream Countries: International Law Considerations. West Asia Quarterly, 1(1).

Ziaei Bigdeli, M. R. (2023). Public International Law (80th edition ed.). Ganj Publications.

Downloads

Publication Timeline

Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted

How to Cite

Dehghani, F. ., Dianat, M., & Soltani, F. (1405). Challenges and Consequences of the Environmental Impacts of Turkey’s GAP Project in the Region and Its Assessment under International Law. Comparative Studies in Jurisprudence, Law, and Politics, 8(2), 1-16. https://csjlp.org/index.php/csjlp/article/view/288

Similar Articles

1-10 of 409

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.