The Ideal Model of Government–Civil Society Interaction in the Protection of Wildlife: A Review of Domestic and International Documents

Authors

    Mehrzad Masihi * Lecturer, Law Department, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran masihi@pnu.ac.ir
https://doi.org/10.61838/csjlp.438

Keywords:

wildlife, government, civil society, international documents, government-civil society interaction

Abstract

The destruction of the environment and the extinction of animal species are among the major threats that, due to human intervention and economic and commercial activities, have become serious dangers to contemporary humanity. In Iranian society, this problem has been intensified by cultural weaknesses, outdated and prescriptive laws, and poor enforcement of existing regulations, leading to the destruction of numerous ecosystems and the extinction or reduction of rare animal species in various regions of the country. In the social and political domains, the lack of support for non-governmental organizations and their structural weakness have resulted in the spread of wildlife trade and the pursuit of profit from such activities. Therefore, the present study seeks to propose an ideal model for the interaction between the government and civil society in the protection of wildlife. The main question is: What mechanisms of interaction between the government and civil society exist in the context of wildlife protection? The findings indicate that, regarding the interaction between the government and civil society in wildlife conservation, several mechanisms can be identified: amending certain legal provisions concerning animal hunting—particularly Article 6 of the Hunting Law; fostering cooperation between domestic and international civil organizations; utilizing the potential of cyberspace and social networks; involving indigenous and local communities in the protection of wildlife habitats; and promoting a public discourse through scientific and educational institutions. In this framework, the government, acting as a facilitator and law reformer through the inclusion of civil society and public organizations, and by creating the necessary conditions to benefit from international and regional experiences, can play a significant role in improving and reforming legal frameworks and regulations. The present paper employs a descriptive–analytical method and relies on library-based research tools.

References

Arya Parsa, A. (2014). Environmental Law and Sustainable Development. Khorsandi Publications.

Babcock, H. M. (2009). Responsible Environmental Behavior, Energy Conservation and Compact Fluorescent Bulbs: You Can Lead a Horse to Water, but Can You Make It Drink? Georgetown University Law Center, 37(4), 943-974.

Khazai, H. (2023). Analyzing Article 6 of the Environmental Protection and Improvement Act: Challenges and Solutions. Quarterly Journal of Legal Civilization, 6(16), 478-453. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/549381/

Majlesi, M. B., Mahmoudi, M. B., & Alavi, A. Z. (2024). Bihar al-Anwar. Dar Ahya al-Turath al-Arabi.

Masjed Sarai, H., & Jabbari, M. (2016). The Violation of Wildlife Rights in Zoos. Quarterly Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence and Law Studies, 8(15), 318-301. https://feqh.semnan.ac.ir/article_1968.html

Mirmohammadi Tabrizi, S. A., Mazloom Khorasani, M., Noqani, M., & Silanian Tusi, A. (2018). Market and Environmental Crimes: Explaining Illegal Bird Hunting in Fereydunkenar. Quarterly Journal of Sociology of Social Institutions, 5(12), 71-39. https://ssi.journals.umz.ac.ir/article_2132.html?lang=en

Movasaghi, H. (2021). Prospects of International Environmental Law in Wildlife Conservation. Ayin Dadresi Publications.

Pourasghar, F. (2007). The Trend of the Environmental Protection Budget During Development Programs. Weekly Program(254). https://civilica.com/doc/78665/

Pourhashami, S. A., Tayebi, S., & Naderi, S. (2015). Litigation and International Responsibility: Tools for Addressing Non-Compliance with Climate Change Commitments. Khorsandi Publications.

Rafati Mehrabadi, M. (2021). Environmental Policies and Social Conflict in Iran: Case Studies of Wildlife and Animal Species. Cultural History Studies, 12(47), 63-39. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/479680/

Sagaris, L. (2018). Citizen Participation for Sustainable Transport: Lessons for Change from Santiago and Temuco, Chile. Research in Transportation Economics, 69(3), 402-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.05.001

Sarkisa, J., Gonzalez, P., & Adenso, B. (2009). Stakeholder Pressure and the Adoption of Environmental Practices: The Mediating Effect of Training. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272696309000709

Shahbazi, A. (2011). Animal Rights: Reflections on Theory and Practice. Quarterly Journal of Legal Research, 14(36), 56-27. https://qjpl.atu.ac.ir/article_2409.html

Shateri, P., Salehi, S., Mohseni, R. A., & Sharifi, M. (2021). Environmental NGOs and Methods for Engaging Members. Journal of Applied Sociology, 32(82), 128-191. https://jas.ui.ac.ir/article_25116.html

Uzun, F. V. (2012). The Effects of Nature Education Project on the Environmental Awareness and Behavior. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2912-2916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.588

Vadaon, S. (2013). Role of NGOs in Environmental Conservation and Development. Mother Earth Consultancy Services. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-009-9565-1

Ziaei Bigdeli, M. R. (2021). Public International Law. Ganj Danesh Publications.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-21

Submitted

2023-07-23

Revised

2023-11-25

Accepted

2023-12-02

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Masihi, M. (1402). The Ideal Model of Government–Civil Society Interaction in the Protection of Wildlife: A Review of Domestic and International Documents. Comparative Studies in Jurisprudence, Law, and Politics, 5(3), 252-265. https://doi.org/10.61838/csjlp.438

Similar Articles

1-10 of 260

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.