A Comparative Analysis of the Status and Legal Requirements of Using Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Investigations, with Emphasis on the Iranian Criminal Justice System
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence (AI), Criminal Investigations, Intelligent Justice, Due Process, Digital EvidenceAbstract
In the contemporary world, the integration of emerging technologies into law-enforcement and judicial processes has fundamentally transformed the traditional paradigm of criminal investigation. Accordingly, the present study aims to analyze the status and legal requirements governing the use of artificial intelligence in criminal investigations, with particular emphasis on the Iranian criminal justice system. The significance and necessity of this study arise from the fact that, despite enhancing the efficiency of processing and analyzing large volumes of criminal data, intelligent decision-support systems have created serious and far-reaching challenges to the protection of defendants’ fundamental rights and the principles of a fair trial. These developments have made it increasingly necessary to reconsider the rules governing algorithmic accountability and judicial security. The principal research question is how the legal requirements and legislative challenges associated with the use of artificial intelligence tools in criminal investigation procedures can be explained and appropriately balanced within the Iranian legal system. The findings indicate that the absence of an explicit legal framework constitutes the principal obstacle to ensuring algorithmic transparency and accountability in the administration of smart justice. It is therefore necessary to revise the traditional rules governing evidence and to adopt specific regulations for managing the risks arising from automated analyses, thereby establishing an appropriate balance between the discovery of truth and the protection of human dignity. This study employs a descriptive-analytical research method based on library research and the examination of domestic and international legal instruments.
References
Alaleeli, S. (2025). The Use of AI-Based Facial Recognition Technology in Security Information Management to Mitigate Minor Theft Anglia Ruskin Research Online (ARRO)].
Aljinovic, N. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Decision-Making: Challenges of Bias and Lack of Transparency of Predictive Algorithms. ORGANIZER, 782.
Ashabi, F., Hamidavi, A., & Mousizadeh Meykhosh, R. (2025). Artificial Intelligence and Rethinking Criminal Justice: A Retributivist and Utilitarian Analysis. Research and Development in Criminal Law and Criminology, 2(4).
Bagheri, P. (2025). Legal Personality and Civil Liability of Artificial Intelligence: Legal Challenges and Solutions. Private Law Research, 13(51).
Cantero Gamito, M., & Marsden, C. T. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Co-Regulation? The Role of Standards in the EU AI Act. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 32(1), eaae011.
Faqir, R. S. (2023). Digital Criminal Investigations in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Overview. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 17(2), 77-94.
Feathers, T. (2024). This AI Tool Helped Convict People of Murder. Then Someone Took a Closer Look. https://www.wired.com/story/ai-tool-convicted-people-murder-cybercheck/
Heydarinejad, N. (2017). A Legal Examination of Electronic Evidence in the Current Legal System. Qanunyar, 3(3).
Homiry, F. (2026). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Criminal Systems and Criminal Justice. International Criminal Law, 3(4), 97-108.
Justice, I. O. C. (2025). Thinking About a Time-Based Topic: 21st-Century Criminal Justice to a Helps. (Vol. 5).
Kusche, I. (2024). Possible Harms of Artificial Intelligence and the EU AI Act: Fundamental Rights and Risk. Journal of Risk Research, 1-14.
Martinovic, A. (2025). Automated Decision-Making and Algorithmic Management: Implications of the CJEU's SCHUFA (Scoring) Case for the EU Labour Law 7th International Scientific Conference: Economics of Digital Transformation (EDT Conference 2024),
Neuwirth, R. J. (2023). Prohibited Artificial Intelligence Practices in the Proposed EU Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA). Computer Law & Security Review, 48, 105798.
Paun, R. D. (2024). Banking Scoring Versus Social Scoring: The Chinese Model in the Light of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Journal of Law and Public Administration, 10(19), 54-62.
Shi, J. (2022). Artificial Intelligence, Algorithms and Sentencing in Chinese Criminal Justice: Problems and Solutions. Criminal Law Forum, 33, 121.
Wang, N., & Tian, M. Y. (2022). Intelligent Justice: AI Implementations in China's Legal Systems. In Artificial Intelligence and Its Discontents: Critiques from the Social Sciences and Humanities (pp. 197-222). Springer International Publishing.
Downloads
Publication Timeline
- Submitted
- Revised
- Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Salameh Abolhasani (Corresponding author); Mahboobeh Sharifi Roodbali, Morteza Azimi, Mehdi Baravandi (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.