The Status of Soft Law in International Law and Related Theories

Authors

  • Hoshang Ahmadi Sarsahra Ph. D student of International Law, Department of Law and Political Science, Faculty of Law, Qeshm Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qeshm, Iran Author https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7485-9171
  • Maryam Moradi Assistant Professor of Private International Law, Faculty of Law, Qeshm Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qeshm, Iran Corresponding author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8434-338X
  • Seyed Bagher Mirabbasi Professor, Department of Law and Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2086-9646

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61838/csjlp.6.3.15

Keywords:

حقوق نرم, حقوق سخت, الزاما حقوقی, معاهده بین المللی, قاعده مشترک بین المللی

Abstract

The inability to enforce is the most prominent feature mentioned in the legal literature, particularly in public international law, regarding soft law or soft regulations. Soft law refers to rules that are not entirely non-binding but are also not strictly binding. Soft law certainly forms a part of the contemporary legislative process by establishing itself as a coherent and consistent rule that seeks to standardize international order in international law. It does so by transforming into custom and international practice. Thus, the rule that is created acts as a coordinating system, either as a preventive measure against potential harm, as a delegated rule for action in the absence of another rule, or as a common international rule. This article, structured through a descriptive-analytical method and based on a library research approach, seeks to answer the question of which theories underpin soft law and how it transforms into a hard law rule in international law.

Downloads

Publication Timeline

Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Ahmadi Sarsahra, H., Moradi , M. ., & Mirabbasi , S. B. . (2024). The Status of Soft Law in International Law and Related Theories. Comparative Studies in Jurisprudence, Law, and Politics, 6(3), 239-258. https://doi.org/10.61838/csjlp.6.3.15

Similar Articles

11-20 of 384

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.