Examining the Challenges and Solutions for Addressing the Immunity of State Officials with Emphasis on the Practice of the International Criminal Court

Authors

Keywords:

immunity, impunity, International Criminal Court, public officials

Abstract

The immunity of state officials, particularly heads of state, constitutes one of the most significant obstacles to the prosecution and punishment of perpetrators of international crimes. With the establishment of the International Criminal Court (ICC), considerable efforts have been undertaken to combat impunity and to restrict the scope of such immunities. However, this matter still faces challenges that require further discussion and examination. The purpose of the present article is to analyze the following crucial question: what are the challenges in addressing the immunity of state officials, and what are the possible solutions to these challenges from the perspective of the practice of the ICC? This article is descriptive-analytical in nature and relies on a library-based research method to examine the question at hand. The findings indicate that the lack of cooperation by certain states, conflicts with customary international law regarding immunity, and the influence of political considerations on the Court’s performance have all created serious obstacles to the realization of international justice. A prominent example of this situation is the case of Omar al-Bashir, the former President of Sudan, who, despite the issuance of an arrest warrant, managed to travel to various countries without being apprehended. Strengthening international and diplomatic cooperation, ensuring the effective enforcement of ICC rulings, introducing reforms in the Court’s approach to dealing with the immunity of state officials, enhancing political and judicial support for the Court, reinforcing oversight mechanisms for the enforcement of ICC judgments, establishing special teams for pursuing arrests, and raising awareness and providing training to states and domestic institutions are among the most significant recommendations for overcoming the challenges associated with addressing the immunity of state officials, with emphasis on the practice of the International Criminal Court.

References

Akande, D. (2009). The Legal Nature of Security Council Referrals to the ICC and Its Impact on Al Bashir's Immunities. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 7(2), 56-115. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqp034

Bantekas, I., & Oette, L. (2016). International Human Rights Law and Practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316417669

Cassese, A. (2003). International Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.

International Criminal Court. (1998). Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. International Criminal Court.

Schabas, W. A. (2011). An Introduction to the International Criminal Court. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975035

Shaw, M. N. (2017). International Law. Cambridge University Press.

Tladi, D. (2015). The ICC Decisions on Chad and Malawi: On Cooperation, Immunities and Article 98. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 13(3).

Downloads

Publication Timeline

Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted

How to Cite

Bahrami, T. ., Fallah, F., Khajvand, M. ., & Eslami, V. . . (1405). Examining the Challenges and Solutions for Addressing the Immunity of State Officials with Emphasis on the Practice of the International Criminal Court. Comparative Studies in Jurisprudence, Law, and Politics, 8(2), 1-14. https://csjlp.org/index.php/csjlp/article/view/574

Similar Articles

1-10 of 274

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.