The Concept of Modernity in the Thought of Constitutionalist Intellectuals: The Interaction of Tradition and Innovation in Contemporary Iran

Authors

    Mohammad Rahim Alavitabar Ph.D. Student in Political Science, Department of Political Science, SR.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
    Seyed Mostafa Abtahi * Department of Political Science, SR.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran m-abtahi@srbiau.ac.ir
    Sayyed Mahdi Mirabedini Department of Political Science, SR.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

Modernity, Constitutionalism, Tradition, Modernization, Iranian Intellectualism

Abstract

Modernity in Iran during the Constitutional era did not emerge as a complete rupture from tradition; rather, it took shape as a complex, multilayered, and dynamic process of interaction, reinterpretation, and redefinition of religious, cultural, and social traditions. Confronted with crises of political, social, and economic backwardness, as well as the experience of centuries of authoritarian rule, Constitutional-era intellectuals sought to establish both theoretical and practical compatibility between indigenous intellectual and cultural heritage and the demands of the modern world. These efforts indicate that Iranian modernity, unlike its Western counterpart, was not merely imitative or unidimensional; instead, it constituted a hybrid, indigenous experience aligned with Iran’s historical, cultural, and religious context. This article, adopting an analytical–theoretical approach, examines various interpretations of modernity in the thought of prominent Constitutional intellectuals and demonstrates that these perspectives can be categorized into three main currents: the rational–critical current, which emphasized reason and social critique; the reformist–gradualist current, which regarded tradition as a foundation for reinterpretation and harmonization with modern values; and the institutional–legal current, which underscored the importance of modern structures, institutions, and legal frameworks in ensuring the sustainability of change. The findings of the study reveal that religious and cultural tradition, within these intellectual frameworks, was not perceived as an absolute obstacle but rather as an element open to redefinition and reinterpretation, capable of serving social, political, and cultural innovation. Accordingly, Iranian modernity was not only compatible with the preservation of the society’s cultural and ethical identity, but also enabled the formation of a critical and indigenous modern project.

References

Adamiyat, F. (1978). The Thought of Mirza Aqa Khan Kermani. Payam Publications.

Adamiyat, F. (1984). The Thought of Talibov Tabrizi (2nd ed.). Damavand.

Ahmadi, B. (1998). Modernity and Critical Thought. Markaz Publications.

Akhundzadeh, M. F. A. (1970). Representations. Kharazmi.

Akhundzadeh, M. F. A. (1985). Maktubat: Letters of Kamal al-Dowleh to Prince Jamal al-Dowleh. Mard-e Emrooz Publications.

Amanat, A. (2004). Pivot of the Universe: Nasir al-Din Shah Qajar and the Iranian Monarchy. Karnameh.

Behnam, J. (1996). Iranians and the Idea of Modernity. Farzan Rooz Publishing and Research.

Davari Ardakani, R. (1980). What Is Philosophy? Allameh Tabatabaei Cultural Center Publications.

Giddens, A. (1998). The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford University Press.

Jahanbegloo, R. (2008). Iran and Modernity. Qatreh Publishing.

Lukacs, G. (1971). History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. MIT Press.

Lyotard, J. F. (1987). The Postmodern Condition. University of Minnesota Press.

Malkom Khan, M. (1946). Treatise on the Principles of Civilization. University of Tehran, Library of Law and Political Science.

Malkom Khan, M. (1976). Qanun. Amir Kabir Publications.

Milani, A. (2003). Modernity and Anti-Modernity in Iran. Akhtaran.

Mojtahed Shabestari, M. (2002). Three Types of Reading Tradition in the Age of Modernity. In A. Soroush (Ed.), Tradition and Secularism. Serat.

Rezaqoli, A. (1994). Sociology of Despotism: A Sociological Analysis of Zahhak the Serpent-Shouldered. Nashr-e Ney.

Ringer, M. M. (2002). Education, Religion, and the Discourse of Cultural Reform in the Qajar Era. Ghoghnous.

Talibov, A. Masalek al-Mohsenin. Kalaleh Khavar.

Talibov, A. (1967). Ketab-e Ahmad (Vol. 1). Joint Stock Company of Pocket Books.

Vahdat, F. (2003). Iranian Intellectual Encounters with Modernity. Ghoghnous.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-23

Submitted

2025-12-31

Revised

2026-04-07

Accepted

2026-04-15

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Alavitabar, M. R. ., Abtahi, S. M. ., & Mirabedini, S. M. . (1405). The Concept of Modernity in the Thought of Constitutionalist Intellectuals: The Interaction of Tradition and Innovation in Contemporary Iran. Comparative Studies in Jurisprudence, Law, and Politics, 1-13. https://csjlp.org/index.php/csjlp/article/view/685

Similar Articles

1-10 of 29

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.