An Introduction to the Theory of Artificial Intelligence Governance in Companies

Authors

Keywords:

Corporate Law, Corporate Governance, Artificial Intelligence, AI Governance, Smart Company

Abstract

Rapid advances in artificial intelligence are challenging the traditional structure of corporate administration by raising fundamental questions concerning decision-making authority, managerial competence, responsibility, and supervision. The central issue is no longer limited to the use of artificial intelligence as a tool for facilitating corporate activities, but extends to the possibility of transferring part of managerial authority to intelligent systems and recognizing them as effective elements within the structure of corporate governance. This study adopts a descriptive-analytical method with a forward-looking approach to formulate the theory of artificial intelligence governance in companies. Within this framework, a distinction is made among assistive, augmented, and autonomous artificial intelligence, while the proposed theory focuses on the level at which an intelligent system moves beyond a supporting role and participates independently in corporate decision-making and management. Two principal institutional models are conceivable: replacing the board of directors with an artificial intelligence system, or establishing an independent AI governance layer alongside existing corporate organs. The legal recognition of such models raises significant challenges, including the absence of legal personality for artificial intelligence, uncertainty regarding the attribution of liability, the need to define the scope of AI authority, and the requirement for effective human oversight. The implementation of AI governance also depends on principles such as transparency, data governance, continuous auditing, accountability, security, AI literacy, and ongoing legal monitoring. The study concludes that full recognition of this theory is not presently compatible with the existing framework of Iranian company law; however, a gradual legal approach based on a special regulatory framework, limited recognition of the legal capacity of intelligent systems, and experimental implementation in small and low-risk companies could provide the basis for the emergence of a new form of corporate organization referred to as the “smart company.”

References

Amini, M., & Kalantarzadeh Sadabad, S. (2026). Reconsidering the Traditional Concept of Legal Personality in Light of Developments in Artificial Intelligence. Legal Studies in Digital Age.

Bertschinger, U. (2015). Aktienrecht im digitalen Zeitalter. In Recht im digitalen Zeitalter: Festgabe Schweizerischer Juristentag 2015 in St. Gallen (pp. 167-202).

Boudraa, K. (2025). Temporary Legal Personality for Artificial Intelligence: A Novel Legal Construct for Accountability. https://ssrn.com/abstract=5349502

Burns, C. (2023). Weak-to-Strong Generalization. https://openai.com/research/weak-to-strong-generalization

Eskini, R. (2014). Commercial Law: Commercial Companies (20th ed., Vol. 1). SAMT.

Gehrlein, M. (2016). Leitung einer juristischen Person durch juristische Person? Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht (NZG).

Hilb, M. (2020). Toward Artificial Governance? The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Shaping the Future of Corporate Governance. Journal of Management and Governance, 24, 851-870.

Johns Hopkins Applied Physics, L. (2023). Johns Hopkins APL Creates Autonomy Safety Net for AFWERX Autonomy Prime Program. https://www.jhuapl.edu/news/news releases/230815-afwerx-autonomy-prime safety

Kazim, E., Denny, D. M. T., & Koshiyama, A. (2021). AI Auditing and Impact Assessment: According to the UK Information Commissioner’s Office. Ai and Ethics, 1.

Knapp, V. (2016). What Are the Issues Relating to Digitalisation in Company Law?

Koulu, R. (2020). Human Control over Automation: EU Policy and AI Ethics. European Journal of Legal Studies, 12(1), 9-46.

Laux, J. (2024). Institutionalised Distrust and Human Oversight of Artificial Intelligence: Towards a Democratic Design of AI Governance under the European Union AI Act. Ai & Society, 39(6), 2853-2866.

Marr, B. (2023). The Difference between Generative AI and Traditional AI: An Easy Explanation for Anyone. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2023/07/24/the-difference-between-generative-ai-and-traditional-ai-an-easy-explanation-for-anyone/

Mirishli, S. (2024). The Role of Legal Frameworks in Shaping Ethical Artificial Intelligence Use in Corporate Governance. International Law and Integration Problems(68), 52-65.

Mökander, J., Morley, J., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2021). Ethics-Based Auditing of Automated Decision-Making Systems: Nature, Scope, and Limitations. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(4).

Möslein, F. (2025). European Company Law in the Age of Digital Transformation: Artificial Intelligence, Data Economy, and Digital Corporate Governance. Era Forum, 26, 629-646.

Nersessian, D., & Mancha, R. (2020). From Automation to Autonomy: Legal and Ethical Responsibility Gaps in Artificial Intelligence Innovation. Michigan Technology Law Review, 27(1).

Paunov, Y., Wänke, M., & Vogel, T. (2019). Transparency Effects on Policy Compliance: Disclosing How Defaults Work Can Enhance Their Effectiveness. Behavioural Public Policy, 3(2).

Wohlfarth, A. (2024). Machine Learning vs. Generative AI: A Detailed Look. https://www.ourcrowd.com/learn/machine-learning-vs-generative-ai

Downloads

Publication Timeline

Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

kalantarzadeh sadabad, S., & Amini , M. . (1407). An Introduction to the Theory of Artificial Intelligence Governance in Companies. Comparative Studies in Jurisprudence, Law, and Politics, 1-18. https://csjlp.org/index.php/csjlp/article/view/973