A Comparative Analysis of Local Governance Structures in Ethnically Diverse Countries: A Case Study of India and Switzerland
Keywords:
Local governance, federalism, ethnic diversity, direct democracy, cantonal autonomyAbstract
This article provides a comparative analysis of local governance structures in India and Switzerland, both of which face extensive ethnic and linguistic diversity. As the world's largest democracy, India utilizes its federal system, characterized by state and local divisions, to manage this diversity. Through mechanisms such as reservation systems and local institutions like the Panchayati Raj, India has ensured broad participation of various ethnic and linguistic groups in the governance process. In contrast, Switzerland relies on its unique model of cantonal federalism and direct democracy to manage its linguistic and ethnic diversity. Swiss cantons, with their significant autonomy, effectively respond to local and ethnic needs. The comparative analysis reveals that both countries have achieved success in managing ethnic and linguistic diversity, albeit through different approaches. This article examines the cultural, historical, and social impacts on local governance in both countries, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each system and offering recommendations for improving local governance in multi-ethnic societies.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.