Cultural Criminology: A Critical Examination and the Necessity of Transformation toward a Multidimensional Paradigm

Authors

    Hadi Pursolayman Department of Law, Go. C., Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran.
    Susan Narimani * Department of Islamic Studies, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran. Soosan.narimani@iau.ac.ir
    Akram Tajik Department of Law, Azadshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Azadshahr, Iran.
https://doi.org/10.61838/

Keywords:

Culture, Emotions, Critiques, Multidimensionality, Psychosocial Contexts 

Abstract

Cultural criminology, as a field that emphasizes the role of culture, emotions, and rationality in understanding the phenomenon of crime, has been accompanied by diverse ideas since its inception. This article aims to examine the evolutionary trajectory of this field, from its foundational premises to its future prospects, by critically analyzing its definitions, historical contexts, and strengths and limitations. In addition, the article places particular emphasis on the necessity of developing multidimensional frameworks for crime analysis that more accurately reflect its inherent complexity. Drawing on textual analysis and the theoretical positions of the pioneers of cultural criminology, as well as the critiques directed at this field, the present study adopts an analytical–historical approach to examine the formation and transformation of cultural criminology. In this context, in addition to reviewing three classical critiques, attention is also devoted to a less frequently discussed criticism concerning the prioritization of symbolic interactionism over socio-psychological concepts. The findings indicate that despite its significant contributions to explaining the role of culture and emotions in the emergence of crime, cultural criminology faces several challenges, including theoretical ambiguity, insufficient attention to structural factors and intersectionality (including gender and social class), and neglect of socio-psychological explanations at the level of individual agency. By contrast, biocentric criminology, as a complementary approach, underscores the necessity of integrating macro, meso, and micro levels in crime analysis. Accordingly, inspired by the perspective of Jonathan Ilan, this article proposes that, in order to overcome existing limitations and develop a comprehensive understanding, cultural criminology must simultaneously incorporate the macro (structural), meso (cultural), and micro (individual) levels into its theoretical and methodological frameworks. Finally, through the presentation of concrete examples, the article offers recommendations for expanding interdisciplinary collaboration and strengthening the multidimensional dimension in future research within this field.

References

Alexander, J. (2001). Cultural Sociology. Wiley-Blackwell.

Alford, R. (1998). The Craft of Inquiry: Theories, Methods, Evidence. Oxford Univ. Press.

Aronowitz, S. (2001). The Knowledge Factory: Dismantling the Corporate University and Creating True Higher Learning. Beacon.

Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality. Anchor Books.

Blumenthal, S. (1988, 1988/10/28). Willie Horton: the making of an election issue. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1988/10/28/willie-horton-the-making-of-an-electionissue/4395a870-0f0e-4c5a-9eff-9ff1c009d59f/

Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism. Prentice Hall.

Chancer, L. (2005). High Profile Crimes: When Legal Cases Become Social Causes. Univ. Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226101132.001.0001

Cohen, S. (2011). Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203828250

Connell, R. (2005). Masculinities. Univ. Calif. Press.

Ferrell, J. (2015). Cultural criminology. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosc171.pub2

Ferrell, J., & Sanders, C. R. (1995). Cultural Criminology. Northeast. Univ. Press.

Gadd, D., & Jefferson, T. (2007). Psychosocial Criminology. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446211496

Garland, D. (2006). Concepts of crime in the sociology of punishment. Theor. Criminol., 10(4), 419-447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480606068873

Geller, A., Fagan, J., Tyler, T., & Link, B. G. (2014). Aggressive policing and the mental health of young urban men. Am. J. Public Health, 104(12), 2321-2327. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302046

Goode, E., & Ben-Yahuda, N. (1994). Moral Panics: The Social Construction of Deviance. Wiley-Blackwell.

Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J., & Roberts, B. (1978). Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State and Law and Order. Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15881-2

Hayward, K. (2016). Cultural criminology: script rewrites. Theor. Criminol., 20, 297-321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480615619668

Hayward, K., & Young, J. (2004). Cultural criminology: some notes on the script. Theor. Criminol., 8, 259-273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480604044608

Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2012). Doing Qualitative Research Differently: A Psychosocial Approach. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526402233

Ilin, J. (2019). Cultural criminology: The time is now. Crit. Criminol., 27, 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-019-09430-2

Jefferson, T. (2021). Stuart Hall, Conjunctural Analysis and Cultural Criminology: A Missed Moment. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74731-2

Jenkins, P. (1997). Intimate Enemies: Moral Panics in Contemporary Great Britain. Aldine de Gruyter.

Katz, J. (1988). The Seductions of Crime: Moral and Sensual Attractions in Doing Evil. Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/1143770

Katz, J. (2001). How Emotions Work. Univ. Chicago Press.

Lamont, M., & Fournier, M. (1993). Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality. Univ. Chicago Press.

Lyng, S. (1990). Edgework: a social psychological analysis of voluntary risk-taking. Am. J. Sociol., 95(4), 851-886. https://doi.org/10.1086/229379

McKinley, J. (2022, 2022/11/09). Tough N.Y. election holds lessons for Republicans and Democrats alike. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/09/nyregion/ny-election-takeaways.html

Messerschmidt, J. (2018). Masculinities and Crime. Rowman Littlefield.

Moran, K. (2015). Social structure and bonhomie: emotions in the youth street gang. Br. J. Criminol., 55(3), 556-577. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azu085

Naegler, L., & Salman, S. (2016). Cultural criminology and gender consciousness: moving feminist theory from margin to center. Fem. Criminol., 11(4), 354-374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085116660609

Newburn, T., & Jones, T. (2005). Symbolic politics and penal populism: the long shadow of Willie Horton. Crime Media Cult., 1(1), 72-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659005050272

Pascoe, C. J. (2011). Dude You're a Fag: Masculinity and Sexuality in High School. Univ. Calif. Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520950696

Ross, J. (2016). Warning: stop and frisk may be hazardous to your health. William Mary Bill Rights J., 25(12), 689-733.

Swidler, A. (2001). Talk of Love: How Culture Matters. Univ. Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226230665.001.0001

Young, J. (2003). Merton with energy, Katz with structure: the sociology of vindictiveness and the criminology of transgression. Theor. Criminol., 7(3), 389-414. https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806030073007

Young, J. (2011a). The Criminological Imagination. Polity.

Young, J. (2011b). Moral panics and the transgressive other. Crime Media Cult., 7(3), 245-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659011417604

Young, J., & Brotherton, D. (2014). Conversation: cultural criminology and its practices: a dialog between the theorist and the street reseaercher. Dialect. Anthropol., 38, 117-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-014-9339-0

Downloads

Published

2026-09-23

Submitted

2025-09-03

Revised

2025-12-18

Accepted

2025-12-25

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Pursolayman, H. ., Narimani, S., & Tajik, A. (1405). Cultural Criminology: A Critical Examination and the Necessity of Transformation toward a Multidimensional Paradigm. Comparative Studies in Jurisprudence, Law, and Politics, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.61838/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 19

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.