The Examination of the Proportionality of Disciplinary Punishments with Committed Offenses in Student Misconduct Cases

Abstract

This article examines the proportionality of disciplinary sanctions in relation to student offenses in academic misconduct cases. The primary goal of the research is to evaluate the structure and processes of disciplinary committees in universities and to assess the adherence to principles of justice and fair trial in these proceedings. The research method is qualitative, involving content analysis of university disciplinary regulations and a review of real cases of student misconduct. The findings indicate that, in many instances, there is a lack of proportionality between the offense committed and the imposed punishment, with students facing unjust and disproportionate sanctions. This issue is particularly evident when minor infractions result in severe penalties, leading to dissatisfaction and a sense of injustice among students. Furthermore, the disciplinary process in many universities is opaque and lengthy, which increases psychological stress for the accused students. The lack of adequate communication regarding students' rights and the absence of a full defense opportunity are major violations of fair trial principles. Based on the research findings, several recommendations are proposed for improving the structure and processes of disciplinary actions, including revising regulations, ensuring the independence of disciplinary bodies, and fully adhering to fair trial principles. These suggestions aim to guarantee justice and proportionality in dealing with student misconduct cases. The final conclusion emphasizes that revising disciplinary regulations and increasing transparency in the disciplinary process could help improve fairness and reduce dissatisfaction in universities.