The Legislative Scope of Civil Liability Arising from Internet Communications in Iranian Law and International Documents

Authors

    Nazli Sabzali PhD Student, Department of Private Law, Damghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damghan, Iran.
    Amir Khajehzadeh * Assistant Professor, Department of Private Law, Damghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damghan, Iran. Khajehzadeh.amir@yahoo.com
    Alireza Hasani Assistant Professor, Department of Private Law, Damghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damghan, Iran.
https://doi.org/10.61838/

Keywords:

utilization, transboundary rivers,, international law, water resources, principle of equity

Abstract

The issue of civil liability arising from Internet communications has always been a highly significant topic both domestically and internationally, consistently drawing the attention of legal policymakers. Given this significance, examining domestic and international laws in this area remains crucial. Furthermore, analyzing Iran’s judicial practice concerning this matter can underscore its importance even more. In the European Union, this form of liability is based on strict liability. A notable reference for further clarification is the European Union Directive on Data Protection (October 24, 1995), whose primary objective is to harmonize the laws of the Member States. According to this directive, Member States cannot reduce the level of protection set forth in the directive within their domestic laws concerning compensation and civil liability. To this end, Chapter III of the directive elaborates on enforcement measures, liabilities, and judicial remedies (Articles 22 to 24). Another relevant document is the European Directive of July 12, 2002, which serves as a supplement to the aforementioned directive. Additionally, the European Directive of March 15, 2006, was enacted to ensure security and prevent criminal activities, addressing compensation for damages incurred by individuals in cyberspace. In Iranian law, this type of liability can be inferred from provisions in the Civil Code, the Civil Liability Act, and the Electronic Commerce Act, including Article 78, which pertains to compensation for damages. This article explicitly refers to compensation for damages arising from transactions and Internet communications by both natural and legal persons. Accordingly, one of the primary objectives of the present study is to examine the legislative scope of civil liability arising from Internet communications in Iranian law and international documents using a descriptive-analytical method. The findings indicate that the legislative scope of this liability is reflected in Iranian laws and judicial practice, as well as in international legal instruments and statutes.

References

Ahmadi Nator, Z., & Aghababaei, Z. (2016). A Comparative Study of Crimes Against Privacy in Cyberspace in Iran and Germany. Media and Culture, 6(1).

Amel Najafabadi, M. (2008). Criminalization in Cyberspace

Ansari, B. (2003). An Introduction to Civil Liability Arising from Internet Communications. Journal of the Faculty of Law and Political Science(66).

Badbini, H. (2005). Philosophy of Civil Liability. Sherkat Sahami Enteshar.

Baistrocchi, P. A. (2002). Liability of Intermediary Service Providers in the EU Directive on Electronic Commerce. Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal, 19, 111-134. https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/chtlj/vol19/iss1/3/

Bojnourdi, M. H. (1992). Al-Qawa'id Al-Fiqhiyyah (Jurisprudential Rules) (Vol. 2). Esmailian.

Cullen, J. (1999). Human Rights and Their History. Nashr Ney.

Dowlatshah, H. (2009). The Charter of the United Nations. Majd.

Ghasemzadeh, S. M. (2011). Obligations and Civil Liability Without Contract. Mizan.

Hosseinpour, P., & Sabernejad, A. (2015). Freedom of Information in Cyberspace from the Perspective of International Law. Majd.

Katouzian, N. (2003). Non-Contractual Obligations (Tort Liability), Civil Liability of Usurpation and Unjust Enrichment (Vol. 2). University of Tehran Press.

Maher Center News. (2022). https://cert.ir/news

Makarem Shirazi, N. (1995). Al-Qawa'id Al-Fiqhiyyah (Jurisprudential Rules). Madreseh Imam Ali Ibn Abi Talib.

Malakouti, R., & Savari, P. (2016). An Introduction to Civil Liability in Cyberspace. Private Law Research Quarterly, 4(15).

Mohseni, F. (2010). Privacy of Information: A Comparative Study in Imamiyyah Jurisprudence, Iranian Criminal Law, and U.S. Law. Imam Sadiq University Press.

Mousazadeh, R. (2009). International Organizations. Mizan.

Nannakar, M. J. (2017). A Commentary on Article 78 of the Electronic Commerce Act. https://virgool.io/@mjnanakar

Razavi Fard, B., & Mousavi, S. N. (2016). Criminal Liability in Cyberspace Under Iranian Law. Criminal Law Research Journal, 5(16).

Weaver, D. (2013). Copyright Rules. Nashr Mizan.

Zamani, S. G., & Attar, S. (2016). Human Rights and the Right to Be Forgotten in the Era of Modern Information Technologies. International Law Journal(55).

Downloads

Published

2026-01-16

Submitted

2025-03-01

Revised

2025-04-07

Accepted

2025-04-15

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Sabzali, N. ., Khajehzadeh, A., & Hasani, . A. . (1404). The Legislative Scope of Civil Liability Arising from Internet Communications in Iranian Law and International Documents. Comparative Studies in Jurisprudence, Law, and Politics, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.61838/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 246

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.